Forensic Voice Comparison
Expert Evidence is a major subscription based service available in paper and online and is a unique and well respected publication offering comprehensive coverage of over 75 expert witness fields. Expert Evidence is essential for preparation and case presentation by litigation lawyers (both civil and criminal), forensic specialists, and any expert drawn into investigations or hearings. The editors of the service are Dr Ian Freckelton SC, a leading member of the Victorian Bar and Hugh Selby, Associate Professor in the Legal Workshop, Law Faculty, of the Australian National University. Contributing experts are drawn from accredited laboratories, respected consultancy firms and highly regarded individual academics and practitioners.
Expert Evidence: 75 Expert Areas is comprehensively drafted to fully prepare the everyday litigator for their legal matter, ensuring for example that your pre-trial conferences run smoothly, the questions you put to your experts are the right questions, your time spent in hearings is productive and ultimately that your client feels they are getting the best advice possible.
Chapter 99: Forensic Voice Comparison
- Morrison G.S., Enzinger E., Zhang C. (2017). Forensic voice comparison (2nd Ed.). In Freckelton I., Selby H. (Eds.), Expert Evidence (Ch. 99). Sydney, Australia: Thomson Reuters.
- Forensic voice comparison is the comparison of one or more audio recordings of the voice of a known speaker with an audio recording of the voice of a speaker of questioned identity for the purpose of presenting expert testimony in court or during pre-trial investigation.
- As part of the Expert Evidence series this chapter is aimed first at lawyers, judges, police officers, and potential jury members; however, it is hoped that this chapter will also be of interest to forensic scientists, phoneticians / speech scientists, speech-processing engineers, and students of all these disciplines. It introduces forensic voice comparison in a relatively non-technical way, assuming a reader who has no prior knowledge of the subject.
- The first edition had a heavy focus on acoustic-phonetic statistical approaches. The second edition has a heavier focus on automatic approaches.
- The second edition includes examples based on real cases.
- Topics covered include:
- The likelihood ratio framework for the evaluation of forensic evidence
- Approches to forensic voice comparison
- Assessing the validity and reliability of forensic-comparison systems
- Speaker identification by laypeople
- Disputed utterance analysis
- The authors:
Praise for the first edition
- “Morrison has a very nice writing style and I think he has phrased some of the fundamental matters in a way that is more clearly put than I have ever seen. I think he has done a masterly job.”
- Dr John S. Buckleton, Principle Scientist, ESR Forensics, Auckland, New Zealand
- “It is very informative and at the same time easy to read – a rare combination. It’s a great book.”
- Dr Michael Jessen, Senior Scientist, Department of Speaker and Audio Analysis, Federal Criminal Police Office, Wiesbaden, Germany
- COMING SOON: download authors’ preprint of Chapter 99: Forensic voice comparison (2st Ed.)
- Morrison G.S. (2010). Forensic voice comparison (1st Ed.). In Freckelton I., Selby H. (Eds.), Expert Evidence (Ch. 99). Sydney, Australia: Thomson Reuters.
- Rose P.J. (2003). The technical comparison of forensic voice samples. In Freckelton I., Selby H. (Eds.), Expert Evidence (Ch. 99). Sydney, Australia: Thomson.
This webpage is maintained by Geoffrey Stewart Morrison.
Last update 2017-02-22